1956 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 Austin Princess
To start off, 1982 Austin Princess is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,700 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Austin Princess weights approximately 130 kg more than 1956 Austin A 40.
Because 1956 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 40 | 1982 Austin Princess | |
Make | Austin | Austin |
Model | A 40 | Princess |
Year Released | 1956 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2690 mm |