1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2004 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. (103 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 457 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. (145 Nm). This means 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2004 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
Model | Tickford | Aveo |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 145 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1073 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2490 mm |