1956 Cadillac 6239D vs. 1993 Volvo 960

To start off, 1993 Volvo 960 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac 6239D would be higher. At 5,972 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Cadillac 6239D is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Cadillac 6239D (285 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1993 Volvo 960. (187 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Cadillac 6239D should accelerate faster than 1993 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Cadillac 6239D weights approximately 480 kg more than 1993 Volvo 960. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1956 Cadillac 6239D has automatic transmission and 1993 Volvo 960 has manual transmission. 1993 Volvo 960 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1956 Cadillac 6239D will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: