1956 DKW Universal vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Universal would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 949 kg more than 1956 DKW Universal.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 DKW Universal. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 DKW Universal | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | DKW | Jeep |
Model | Universal | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1956 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 894 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1874 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1839 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2423 mm |