1956 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,783 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 55 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fairlane | Outlander |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4783 cc | 2375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1465 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2640 mm |