1956 Isuzu Minx vs. 2011 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2011 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,300 cc, 2011 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1956 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 424 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Isuzu Minx | 2011 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Minx | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1341 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2703 mm |