1956 Opel Rekord vs. 1998 Rover 200
To start off, 1998 Rover 200 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Opel Rekord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1956 Opel Rekord. (44 HP @ 3900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1956 Opel Rekord.
Because 1956 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Opel Rekord | 1998 Rover 200 | |
Make | Opel | Rover |
Model | Rekord | 200 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |