1956 Renault Juva vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Renault Juva would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 976 kg more than 1956 Renault Juva.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Renault Juva | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Renault | Cadillac |
| Model | Juva | CTS |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 845 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2880 mm |
