1957 Holden FJ vs. 1967 Holden HR
To start off, 1967 Holden HR is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Holden FJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Holden FJ would be higher. At 3,048 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Holden HR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Holden HR (108 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1957 Holden FJ. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Holden HR should accelerate faster than 1957 Holden FJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Holden HR weights approximately 290 kg more than 1957 Holden FJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Holden FJ | 1967 Holden HR | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | FJ | HR |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2150 cc | 3048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
