1957 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 764 kg more than 1957 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2013 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
| Model | Silver Cloud | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4885 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 376 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 2714 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1955 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3100 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 108 L | 100 L |
