1957 Toyota Master RR vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1957 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1957 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda CR-V weights approximately 290 kg more than 1957 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Toyota Master RR | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | Master RR | CR-V |
Year Released | 1957 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2620 mm |