1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 vs. 1990 Buick LeSabre
To start off, 1990 Buick LeSabre is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Buick LeSabre (150 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. (106 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 162 kg more than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Buick LeSabre (271 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000. (152 Nm). This means 1990 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Alfa Romeo 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Alfa Romeo 2000 | 1990 Buick LeSabre | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Buick |
Model | 2000 | LeSabre |
Year Released | 1958 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1975 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 271 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 96.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1337 kg | 1499 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 68 L |