1958 Austin A 35 vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1958 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1958 Austin A 35.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (616 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 548 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Austin A 35 | 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A 35 | ML |
Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 616 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 2141 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1796 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 93 L |