1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2006 Rover 75. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 645 kg more than 2006 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | 62 | 75 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2750 mm |