1958 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2003 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2003 Lincoln Continental is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 110 kg more than 1958 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1958 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Chevrolet Impala | 2003 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
| Model | Impala | Continental |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3851 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2780 mm |
