1958 Lotus 16 vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1958 Lotus 16. (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1958 Lotus 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S60 weights approximately 1016 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Lotus 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Lotus 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Lotus 16 | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Lotus | Volvo |
Model | 16 | S60 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1566 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2670 mm |