1958 Maserati 250 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Maserati 250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Maserati 250 (193 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Maserati 250 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Clio weights approximately 515 kg more than 1958 Maserati 250.
Because 1958 Maserati 250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Maserati 250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Maserati 250 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Maserati | Renault |
| Model | 250 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1460 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1175 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2580 mm |
