1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1946 Buick 40
To start off, 1959 Abarth 1600 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Buick 40 (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1946 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 885 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Abarth 1600 | 1946 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Abarth | Buick |
| Model | 1600 | 40 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 5249 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 87.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 109.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1845 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3000 mm |
