1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1964 Austin Princess
To start off, 1964 Austin Princess is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Austin Princess (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1959 Abarth 1600. (95 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 1959 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 1964 Austin Princess | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | 1600 | Princess |
Year Released | 1959 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 72 L |