1959 Abarth 1600 vs. 1984 Audi 200
To start off, 1984 Audi 200 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Audi 200 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1959 Abarth 1600.
Because 1959 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Abarth 1600 | 1984 Audi 200 | |
Make | Abarth | Audi |
Model | 1600 | 200 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2700 mm |