1959 Austin A 90 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 90. (102 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 575 kg more than 1959 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 90 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 90 | 62 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 7028 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 79 L |