1959 Austin-Healey 3000 vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 would be higher. At 2,911 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin-Healey 3000.
Because 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin-Healey 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 (237 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 1959 Austin-Healey 3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin-Healey 3000 | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Holden |
Model | 3000 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1959 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2911 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2685 mm |