1959 BMW 700 vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 BMW 700 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1959 BMW 700. (39 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1959 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 850 kg more than 1959 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 BMW 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 BMW 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 BMW 700. (50 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 BMW 700. 2013 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1959 BMW 700 has manual transmission. 1959 BMW 700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 BMW 700 | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 700 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 695 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 50 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |