1959 Bristol 406 vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Bristol 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Bristol 406 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1959 Bristol 406. (91 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1959 Bristol 406.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Bristol 406. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Bristol 406. (174 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Bristol 406.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Bristol 406 | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | 406 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2216 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 191 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 68.7 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.6 mm | 87 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 72 L |