1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta
To start off, 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta (301 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 575 kg more than 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta has manual transmission. 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta | |
| Make | Cadillac | De Tomaso |
| Model | 62 | Mangusta |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2510 mm |
