1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1979 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1979 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1979 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1979 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2480 mm |