1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 507 kg more than 2002 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | 62 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3173 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1618 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 66 L |
