1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 796 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3725 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 76 L |