1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 3. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 747 kg more than 2013 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2013 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2013 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1378 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4595 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 55 L |
