1959 DAF 600 vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Challenger (250 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 DAF 600 | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | DAF | Dodge |
| Model | 600 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 3518 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 70 L |
