1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2003 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,099 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (157 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Because 1959 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Jaguar X-Type has automatic transmission and 1959 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1959 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Jaguar X-Type will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 12 M | 2003 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | 12 M | X-Type |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2099 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1490 mm |