1959 Ford 17M vs. 1964 Seat 1500
To start off, 1964 Seat 1500 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 1,697 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Ford 17M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Seat 1500 (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1959 Ford 17M. (59 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Seat 1500 should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 17M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Seat 1500 weights approximately 45 kg more than 1959 Ford 17M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 17M | 1964 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | 17M | 1500 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2660 mm |