1959 Ford 17M vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 3,969 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1959 Ford 17M. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 17M.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford 17M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (301 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford 17M. (120 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford 17M.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 17M | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | 17M | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 3969 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 301 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2380 mm |