1960 AC Greyhound vs. 1961 AC Aceca
To start off, 1961 AC Aceca is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. Both 1960 AC Greyhound and 1961 AC Aceca are equipped with a 1,971 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Aceca (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 AC Greyhound weights approximately 121 kg more than 1961 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 AC Greyhound | 1961 AC Aceca | |
| Make | AC | AC |
| Model | Greyhound | Aceca |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 125 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 66 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 96 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 894 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 59 L |
