1960 Austin 7 vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 826 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (221 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 7 | 6 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 94 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1436 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 68 L |