1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz R | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | R |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5461 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 382 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3220 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |
