1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 130 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2490 mm |
