1960 Jaguar XK vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 432 kg more than 1960 Jaguar XK.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer (382 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jaguar XK. (310 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jaguar XK | 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
Model | XK | Lancer |
Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 87.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1473 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 71 L |