1960 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1992 Marcos Mantula
To start off, 1992 Marcos Mantula is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,945 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Marcos Mantula is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Marcos Mantula (173 HP @ 4550 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Marcos Mantula should accelerate faster than 1960 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1992 Marcos Mantula.
Because 1960 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Marcos Mantula. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Marcos Mantula (291 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1992 Marcos Mantula will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jeep CJ5 | 1992 Marcos Mantula | |
Make | Jeep | Marcos |
Model | CJ5 | Mantula |
Year Released | 1960 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 3945 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4550 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 291 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2280 mm |