1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (353 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
| Model | Cedric | ATS |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4643 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1805 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1421 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2775 mm |
