1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 1977 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1977 Triumph Stag is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Triumph Stag (143 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 1977 Triumph Stag | |
| Make | Toyota | Triumph |
| Model | Master RR | Stag |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 2997 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 63 L |
