1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2000 Vector RD 180
To start off, 2000 Vector RD 180 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Vector RD 180 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Vector RD 180 (180 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Vector RD 180 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2000 Vector RD 180 | |
| Make | Toyota | Vector |
| Model | Master RR | RD 180 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1797 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 180 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2390 mm |
