1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2003 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2003 Holden Cruze is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,490 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Cruze (72 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 225 kg more than 2003 Holden Cruze.
Because 2003 Holden Cruze is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Cruze will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2003 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Toyota | Holden |
| Model | Master RR | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1490 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 72 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2370 mm |
