1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2009 BMW 318
To start off, 2009 BMW 318 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 BMW 318 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 318 (148 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 318 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW 318 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2009 BMW 318 | |
| Make | Toyota | BMW |
| Model | Master RR | 318 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 63 L |
