1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2010 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado (185 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 51 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
|1960 Toyota Master RR||2010 Chevrolet Colorado|
|Engine Size||1453 cc||2901 cc|
|Horse Power||40 HP||185 HP|
|Number of Doors||5 doors||4 doors|
|Vehicle Weight||1210 kg||1261 kg|
|Vehicle Length||4280 mm||4890 mm|
|Vehicle Width||1680 mm||1720 mm|
|Vehicle Height||1560 mm||1650 mm|
|Wheelbase Size||2540 mm||2830 mm|
|Fuel Tank Capacity||75 L||72 L|