1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2010 Mazda Premacy
To start off, 2010 Mazda Premacy is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Premacy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda Premacy (99 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Premacy should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda Premacy weights approximately 245 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Premacy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Toyota Master RR | 2010 Mazda Premacy | |
Make | Toyota | Mazda |
Model | Master RR | Premacy |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1455 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 58 L |