1960 Toyota Master RR vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 5,200 cc (10 cylinders), 2012 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (525 HP) has 485 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi R8 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Toyota Master RR | 2012 Audi R8 | |
| Make | Toyota | Audi |
| Model | Master RR | R8 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 5200 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 525 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1685 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1252 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 90 L |
