1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo weights approximately 70 kg more than 1961 Abarth 2200.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Abarth 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 2200 | 2005 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Abarth | Mitsubishi |
Model | 2200 | Dingo |
Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2450 mm |