1961 AC Cobra vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Cobra would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 205 kg more than 1961 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 AC Cobra (365 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1961 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Cobra | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | AC | Mini |
Model | Cobra | Cooper |
Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3723 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |