1961 Alfa Romeo Spider vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 433 kg more than 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider.
Because 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Alfa Romeo Spider | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | Spider | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1975 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 180 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1713 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2857 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 71 L |
